As Phish powers their way through the Northeast, they begin their final week of this fall tour in Amherst, MA. For this evening, there are 4 different sources available. I want to thank the tapers for doing such a great job recording the shows and releasing them to the public so quickly. They really do a great job.
Source 1 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>kind cables>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location:OTS/LOC/DIN@ 10ft
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0(Resample and Dithering>CD Wave(tacking>TLH(flac 16 level 8)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps Matrix source)
Source: Schoeps mk5> KCY> Schoeps VMS02IB + Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> EAA PSP-2> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, mk5(omni)/Split 10'/0 Degrees/9' Stands, mk41/DFC/NOS/8' Stand
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
24 bit Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheiser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed at PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter MK22 source)
ORTF 60' from stage DFC
Schoeps MK22>KC5>CMC6>Sonosax SX-M2>Apogee Mini-me(aes out 24bit/96khz)>COAX>Edirol R-44
SDHC Card>usb>Macbook Pro>Wave Editor(tracking,fades,resample(izotope)/dither(mbit+)to 16bit/44.1khz)>XAct(FLAC 8,ffp,fix sbe)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
As with previous nights, there are some excellent recordings to choose from.
The Busman source, and really all of them, have excellent levels right from the beginning. The bass is a little boomy, but the high-end sounds divine. There is definitely more bass response in this evening's recording as opposed to the 10-23 recording. The low-end just doesn't have the tonal quality of the Schoeps Matrix. Bottom line, if I could take the highs and mids from this source and mix them with the lows from the Schoeps Matrix, I would be in heaven. As it is, the lack of tonal quality in the very low frequencies made me pick the Schoeps over this source.
As I stated above, the Schoeps Matrix is my favorite recording from this evening. The highs are crisp, but they don't have the presence of the Busman source. However, the low-end is very nice, though a bit on the boomy side. There is noticeable tone at the low-end that is absent in the other sources.
The Sennheiser source has more bass than I've come to expect from this source, but it is mostly boom and lacks the really nice tonal quality of the Schoeps Matrix. This highs are quite nice though.
The FOB MK22 source is definitely the best sounding of the FOB MK22's I've heard this tour. That said, there is a lot of crowd noise, more than the night before, and for some reason Trey sounds distant. Notice the chopping that Trey adds during the verses of Ride Captain Ride, or more to the point, the fact that you can only make them out with difficulty. On the Busman source, they are still quiet, which they are supposed to be, but they are quite distinct. This source is also not as boomy as previous FOB MK22's, but still not really defined in the lowest frequencies.
For me, I'll be downloading the 24 bit Schoeps Matrix again.
Happy listening!
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
10-23-10 Mullins Center, Amherst, MA Source Review
Yet another bumper crop of recordings as Phish winds their way through the Northeast. For this show, there are 6 sources available, again with many available in 16 and 24 bit sources. I want to thank all the tapers for doing such yeoman's work. Without their efforts, I wouldn't be able to do this project.
Source 1 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>HYDRA silver Shorty XLR's>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location: OTC/LOC/DIN
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0(Resample and Dithering>CD Wave(tacking>TLH(flac 16 level 8)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps Matrix)
Source: Schoeps mk4v> KCY> Schoeps VMS02IB + Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> Aeta PSP-3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, mk4v/Split 15'/8' Stands/Pointed at outside of stacks, mk41/DFC/NOS/8' Stand
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheiser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
Config/Location: NOS/OTS/DFC 8' stand
Transfer: 722>Firewire>Macbook>
Sound Studio 3.6(fades, normalize peak, track)>Wave Editor (iZotope Resampler/MBIT+ Dither)>
xACT 1.71(align on sector boundaries, encode, tag, fingerprint)>flac16
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter AKG source)
AKG c214 > Silver Cables > FR-2LE [BA TMod] (24/96)
CF Card > Audacity (fades, tracking) > r8brain (downsampling) > TLH > Flac (level 8)
OTS/DFC/DIN/about 10' high
Files tagged in TagScanner
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 6 (hereafter MK22 source)
ORTF 60' from stage DFC
Schoeps MK22>KC5>CMC6>Sonosax SX-M2>Apogee Mini-me(aes out 24bit/96khz)>COAX>Edirol R-44
SDHC Card>usb>Macbook Pro>Wave Editor(tracking,fades,resample(izotope)/dither(mbit+)to 16bit/44.1khz)>XAct(FLAC 8,ffp,fix sbe)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
The tapers did a great job at this show. It was very difficult to decide on a preferred source, in fact several are really top notch.
The Busman source has really nice levels right from the start. The highs are very nice and the bass is nicely rounded, with most notes sounding very clear all the way down to the lowest frequencies. However, the overall bass response came across as a bit thin compared to some of the other sources.
The Schoeps Matrix source is fantastic. There is more crowd noise than the other sources (maybe even a bit more than the FOB, surprisingly enough). However, the highs are great and the mids have a lot of presence as well. The low end has great definition, even at the lowest frequencies, and there is a bit of punch to it as well. Listen carefully to Gordon's work at the beginning of Boogie On, his notes sound precise and not at all muddy. This was the section that sealed the deal for me on this source. My pick for the best, but not by a whole lot.
The Sennheiser source is also very good. The mids are not as crisp as in the Schoeps Matrix, but the bass is quite nice. Overall this is definitely one of the top 3 or 4, but the differences between it, the DPA, and the Busman source are fairly minor.
The DPA source doesn't have as distinct mids as the Busman or Schoeps Matrix. Also, this tape is not as crisp in the highs as the Schoeps Matrix either.
The AKG source has low levels at the very beginning. While they get better later in the recording, they are still relatively low. The bass doesn't have a ton of punch, however the highs are very crispy.
The FOB MK22 source has low levels, and given that its FOB, a fair amount of crowd noise, though not as much as you might expect. The mids, like a few of the other sources, are not as distinct, and the low end is boomier than any of the other sources.
Overall, these are some great tapes, and the differences between the top 4 are very minor. You really can't go wrong with any of these recordings. However, I am downloading the Schoeps Matrix in 24 bit resolution for my personal collection.
Happy listening!
Source 1 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>HYDRA silver Shorty XLR's>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location: OTC/LOC/DIN
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0(Resample and Dithering>CD Wave(tacking>TLH(flac 16 level 8)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps Matrix)
Source: Schoeps mk4v> KCY> Schoeps VMS02IB + Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> Aeta PSP-3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, mk4v/Split 15'/8' Stands/Pointed at outside of stacks, mk41/DFC/NOS/8' Stand
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheiser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
Config/Location: NOS/OTS/DFC 8' stand
Transfer: 722>Firewire>Macbook>
Sound Studio 3.6(fades, normalize peak, track)>Wave Editor (iZotope Resampler/MBIT+ Dither)>
xACT 1.71(align on sector boundaries, encode, tag, fingerprint)>flac16
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter AKG source)
AKG c214 > Silver Cables > FR-2LE [BA TMod] (24/96)
CF Card > Audacity (fades, tracking) > r8brain (downsampling) > TLH > Flac (level 8)
OTS/DFC/DIN/about 10' high
Files tagged in TagScanner
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 6 (hereafter MK22 source)
ORTF 60' from stage DFC
Schoeps MK22>KC5>CMC6>Sonosax SX-M2>Apogee Mini-me(aes out 24bit/96khz)>COAX>Edirol R-44
SDHC Card>usb>Macbook Pro>Wave Editor(tracking,fades,resample(izotope)/dither(mbit+)to 16bit/44.1khz)>XAct(FLAC 8,ffp,fix sbe)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
The tapers did a great job at this show. It was very difficult to decide on a preferred source, in fact several are really top notch.
The Busman source has really nice levels right from the start. The highs are very nice and the bass is nicely rounded, with most notes sounding very clear all the way down to the lowest frequencies. However, the overall bass response came across as a bit thin compared to some of the other sources.
The Schoeps Matrix source is fantastic. There is more crowd noise than the other sources (maybe even a bit more than the FOB, surprisingly enough). However, the highs are great and the mids have a lot of presence as well. The low end has great definition, even at the lowest frequencies, and there is a bit of punch to it as well. Listen carefully to Gordon's work at the beginning of Boogie On, his notes sound precise and not at all muddy. This was the section that sealed the deal for me on this source. My pick for the best, but not by a whole lot.
The Sennheiser source is also very good. The mids are not as crisp as in the Schoeps Matrix, but the bass is quite nice. Overall this is definitely one of the top 3 or 4, but the differences between it, the DPA, and the Busman source are fairly minor.
The DPA source doesn't have as distinct mids as the Busman or Schoeps Matrix. Also, this tape is not as crisp in the highs as the Schoeps Matrix either.
The AKG source has low levels at the very beginning. While they get better later in the recording, they are still relatively low. The bass doesn't have a ton of punch, however the highs are very crispy.
The FOB MK22 source has low levels, and given that its FOB, a fair amount of crowd noise, though not as much as you might expect. The mids, like a few of the other sources, are not as distinct, and the low end is boomier than any of the other sources.
Overall, these are some great tapes, and the differences between the top 4 are very minor. You really can't go wrong with any of these recordings. However, I am downloading the Schoeps Matrix in 24 bit resolution for my personal collection.
Happy listening!
Monday, October 25, 2010
10-22-10 Dunkin' Donuts Center, Providence, RI Source Review
There are six sources available from this show, many available in both 16 and 24 bit format. Thanks to all the tapers for getting these shows out into the public sphere so quickly. Without their efforts, I wouldn't be able to lay my ears onto these sources.
Source 1 (hereafter MK22 source)
ORTF 60' from stage DFC
Schoeps MK22>KC5>CMC6>Sonosax SX-M2>Apogee Mini-me(aes out 24bit/96khz)>COAX>Edirol R-44
SDHC Card>usb>Macbook Pro>Wave Editor(tracking,fades,resample(izotope)/dither(mbit+)to 16bit/44.1khz)>XAct(FLAC 8,ffp,fix sbe)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter AKG source)
AKG c214 > Silver Cables > FR-2LE [BA TMod] (24/96)
CF Card > Audacity (fades, tracking) > r8brain (downsampling) > TLH > Flac (level 8)
OTS/LOC/DIN/about 10' high
Files tagged in TagScanner
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
Config/Location: DIN/OTS/DFC 10' stand
Transfer: 722>Firewire>Macbook>
Sound Studio 3.6(fades, normalize peak, track)>Wave Editor (iZotope Resampler/MBIT+ Dither)>
xACT 1.71(align on sector boundaries, encode, tag, fingerprint)>flac16
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter MK5 source)
Source: Schoeps mk5> KC5> M222> NT222> Lunatec V3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, DFC, 8' Stand, NOS, mk5/cardioid
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter Beyer source)
Source: beyerdynamic CK930 > Grace Design Lunatec V3 > Marantz PMD-661 (@ 24 bit / 96 kHz)
Transfer: SDHC Card > Samplitude SE v9.1.1 (fades, level adjustments, resample to 44.1 kHz, dither to 16 bit) > FLAC v1.2.1 (Level 8)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 6 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>kind cables>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location: OTS/LOC/Din
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0(Resample and Dithering>CD Wave(tacking>TLH(flac 16 level 8)
Etree Source
Phish played their third top notch show in a row this night and it is great that there are so many sources to choose from.
The MK22 source is pretty boomy right from the beginning. The levels are very nice and the high end is crisp. However, despite the fact that it is a front-of-board recording, it still sounds distant. The bass sounds quite good, but it is overpowering at times.
The Busman source is quite good. The bass is not nearly as boomy as the other sources, however, there is very little tone to the bass at lower frequencies either. The high-end is noticeably crisper than any of the other sources as well.
The Beyer source is boomier than the Busman source, but not as boomy as the MK22. Again, there are nice, crisp highs. I like the tone of the guitar on this source in particular. Unlike some of the other sources, the kick drum is also boomy.
On the DPA source, the kick is quite clear, however Gordon is a bit boomy. Overall, this is a very listenable recording and I would say it is the 2nd best of the 6. There is more audience noise than the Busman source, but the overall effect is quite balanced.
The MK5 source has very crisp highs and great definition throughout the sonic range. The bass is nice and rounded with good tone all the way down to the lowest notes. This is the best source to my ears.
The AKG source is not nearly as punchy as any of the other sources. You can't feel the bass at all, and there is not a lot of tonal distinction down low either.
The MK5 source is available in 24 bit and that is the source I will have on my hard drive.
Happy listening!
Source 1 (hereafter MK22 source)
ORTF 60' from stage DFC
Schoeps MK22>KC5>CMC6>Sonosax SX-M2>Apogee Mini-me(aes out 24bit/96khz)>COAX>Edirol R-44
SDHC Card>usb>Macbook Pro>Wave Editor(tracking,fades,resample(izotope)/dither(mbit+)to 16bit/44.1khz)>XAct(FLAC 8,ffp,fix sbe)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter AKG source)
AKG c214 > Silver Cables > FR-2LE [BA TMod] (24/96)
CF Card > Audacity (fades, tracking) > r8brain (downsampling) > TLH > Flac (level 8)
OTS/LOC/DIN/about 10' high
Files tagged in TagScanner
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
Config/Location: DIN/OTS/DFC 10' stand
Transfer: 722>Firewire>Macbook>
Sound Studio 3.6(fades, normalize peak, track)>Wave Editor (iZotope Resampler/MBIT+ Dither)>
xACT 1.71(align on sector boundaries, encode, tag, fingerprint)>flac16
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter MK5 source)
Source: Schoeps mk5> KC5> M222> NT222> Lunatec V3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, DFC, 8' Stand, NOS, mk5/cardioid
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter Beyer source)
Source: beyerdynamic CK930 > Grace Design Lunatec V3 > Marantz PMD-661 (@ 24 bit / 96 kHz)
Transfer: SDHC Card > Samplitude SE v9.1.1 (fades, level adjustments, resample to 44.1 kHz, dither to 16 bit) > FLAC v1.2.1 (Level 8)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 6 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>kind cables>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location: OTS/LOC/Din
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0(Resample and Dithering>CD Wave(tacking>TLH(flac 16 level 8)
Etree Source
Phish played their third top notch show in a row this night and it is great that there are so many sources to choose from.
The MK22 source is pretty boomy right from the beginning. The levels are very nice and the high end is crisp. However, despite the fact that it is a front-of-board recording, it still sounds distant. The bass sounds quite good, but it is overpowering at times.
The Busman source is quite good. The bass is not nearly as boomy as the other sources, however, there is very little tone to the bass at lower frequencies either. The high-end is noticeably crisper than any of the other sources as well.
The Beyer source is boomier than the Busman source, but not as boomy as the MK22. Again, there are nice, crisp highs. I like the tone of the guitar on this source in particular. Unlike some of the other sources, the kick drum is also boomy.
On the DPA source, the kick is quite clear, however Gordon is a bit boomy. Overall, this is a very listenable recording and I would say it is the 2nd best of the 6. There is more audience noise than the Busman source, but the overall effect is quite balanced.
The MK5 source has very crisp highs and great definition throughout the sonic range. The bass is nice and rounded with good tone all the way down to the lowest notes. This is the best source to my ears.
The AKG source is not nearly as punchy as any of the other sources. You can't feel the bass at all, and there is not a lot of tonal distinction down low either.
The MK5 source is available in 24 bit and that is the source I will have on my hard drive.
Happy listening!
Sunday, October 24, 2010
10-20-10 Utica Memorial Auditorium, Utica, NY Source Review
For this fantastic show, there are 5 sources available. There are several that are really superb here, in fact, my choice of the best is really a toss-up between two of them.
Source 1 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>kind cables>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location: OTS /LOC/DIN
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0>CD Wave>TLH(flac 16)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter FOB 140 source)
Source: (FOB) Neumann AK40/LC3/KM100 (DIN)> Grace Design Lunatec V3 (Analog)> (Oade Concert Modified) Edirol R-44 (24/48 on a SDHC Card).
Transfer: SDHC Card> Card Reader> PC> Samplitude SE No. 9 (Fade in/out, normalize, dither to 16 bit, and resample to 44.1k)> CD Wav (Tracked and converted to flac @ level 8).
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
Config/Location: DIN/FOH/OTS/SROC front row right corner of FOH 10' stand
Transfer: 722>Firewire>Macbook>
Sound Studio 3.6(fades, normalize peak, track)>Wave Editor (iZotope Resampler/MBIT+ Dither)>
xACT 1.71(align on sector boundaries, encode, tag, fingerprint)>flac16
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter SKM 140 source)
Location: OTS just FOB, front right corner of soundboard barrier
Mic config: mics outside stacks, Sabra-Som SSM-1 shock mounts/stereo bar, Manfrotto air-cushioned stand @ 10.5 ft, small screens
Source: 2 Neumann SKM 140’s(AK40 caps/LC3 actives/KM100)>>GAKables xlr>Lunatec V2>GAKables xlr>Apogee Mini-Me@96/24>AES/EBU>Sound Devices 722 @96kHz/24bit
Transfer: Sound Devices 722 master file @96kHz/24bit>firewire>Sound Forge 9.0e>44.1/16-CD Wave v1.96.1(tracking)>tag w/Tag Scanner5.0,fingerprint/FLAC16 via FLAC frontend 1.7.1(level 8)
Notes: ~ S.F. 9.0 (mastering limiter by 2db to -.20db character 10, fades, resample(high setting 4) w/anti alias filter & dither-high pass triangular/noise shaping-high pass contour to 44.1/16)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter Nak source)
Source: Edirol UA-5>Edirol R-09 HR>Nakamichi 300 Mics W/CP4 Shotguns>CD WAV Editor>Traders Little Helper>Flac Level 8
Etree Source
First off, you have to love that picture there. It pretty much says it all. I want to thank the tapers for bringing the aud's every night. They have been great this tour, and this was a great show, plain and simple.
The Busman source sounds relatively tinny, the highs are very crisp, but the lows just aren't there. There is really no punch from the kick or from Gordon hitting really low notes. The levels are quite nice however.
The FOB 140 source has nice levels as well. The highs are crips, but there is not as much high end as in any of the other sources. This actually tends to make it sound less crisp in comparison, but the essentials, the high-hats and ride cymbals, still sound great. The bass is richer than the Busman source. Overall, this is probably the 3rd best of the 5 recordings.
The Nak 300 source has the most problems in the low end. It sounds like there is a notch filter on everything below 120 hz. There is just not bass response at the low end and the kick drum is almost non-existant. Definitely my least favorite of the 5 recordings.
The DPA source has really nice levels, good bass response and crisp highs. Just a great sounding recording.
The SKM 140 source is also great sounding. Great bass response and crisp highs. Quite honestly, you can't go wrong with either the DPA source, or the SKM 140 source. For myself, I have gone with the SKM source because it is available in 24 bit. Either way, great recordings guys.
Happy listening!
Source 1 (hereafter Busman source)
Source: Busman Bsc1 (Hypers)>kind cables>Fostex FR-2LE(Busman T-mod)
Location: OTS /LOC/DIN
Transfer: FR-2LE>Wavelab 6.0>CD Wave>TLH(flac 16)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter FOB 140 source)
Source: (FOB) Neumann AK40/LC3/KM100 (DIN)> Grace Design Lunatec V3 (Analog)> (Oade Concert Modified) Edirol R-44 (24/48 on a SDHC Card).
Transfer: SDHC Card> Card Reader> PC> Samplitude SE No. 9 (Fade in/out, normalize, dither to 16 bit, and resample to 44.1k)> CD Wav (Tracked and converted to flac @ level 8).
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023>Sonosax SX-M2>Sound Devices 722 (24/96)
Config/Location: DIN/FOH/OTS/SROC front row right corner of FOH 10' stand
Transfer: 722>Firewire>Macbook>
Sound Studio 3.6(fades, normalize peak, track)>Wave Editor (iZotope Resampler/MBIT+ Dither)>
xACT 1.71(align on sector boundaries, encode, tag, fingerprint)>flac16
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter SKM 140 source)
Location: OTS just FOB, front right corner of soundboard barrier
Mic config: mics outside stacks, Sabra-Som SSM-1 shock mounts/stereo bar, Manfrotto air-cushioned stand @ 10.5 ft, small screens
Source: 2 Neumann SKM 140’s(AK40 caps/LC3 actives/KM100)>>GAKables xlr>Lunatec V2>GAKables xlr>Apogee Mini-Me@96/24>AES/EBU>Sound Devices 722 @96kHz/24bit
Transfer: Sound Devices 722 master file @96kHz/24bit>firewire>Sound Forge 9.0e>44.1/16-CD Wave v1.96.1(tracking)>tag w/Tag Scanner5.0,fingerprint/FLAC16 via FLAC frontend 1.7.1(level 8)
Notes: ~ S.F. 9.0 (mastering limiter by 2db to -.20db character 10, fades, resample(high setting 4) w/anti alias filter & dither-high pass triangular/noise shaping-high pass contour to 44.1/16)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter Nak source)
Source: Edirol UA-5>Edirol R-09 HR>Nakamichi 300 Mics W/CP4 Shotguns>CD WAV Editor>Traders Little Helper>Flac Level 8
Etree Source
First off, you have to love that picture there. It pretty much says it all. I want to thank the tapers for bringing the aud's every night. They have been great this tour, and this was a great show, plain and simple.
The Busman source sounds relatively tinny, the highs are very crisp, but the lows just aren't there. There is really no punch from the kick or from Gordon hitting really low notes. The levels are quite nice however.
The FOB 140 source has nice levels as well. The highs are crips, but there is not as much high end as in any of the other sources. This actually tends to make it sound less crisp in comparison, but the essentials, the high-hats and ride cymbals, still sound great. The bass is richer than the Busman source. Overall, this is probably the 3rd best of the 5 recordings.
The Nak 300 source has the most problems in the low end. It sounds like there is a notch filter on everything below 120 hz. There is just not bass response at the low end and the kick drum is almost non-existant. Definitely my least favorite of the 5 recordings.
The DPA source has really nice levels, good bass response and crisp highs. Just a great sounding recording.
The SKM 140 source is also great sounding. Great bass response and crisp highs. Quite honestly, you can't go wrong with either the DPA source, or the SKM 140 source. For myself, I have gone with the SKM source because it is available in 24 bit. Either way, great recordings guys.
Happy listening!
Friday, October 22, 2010
My Setup
In response to the excellent comment from T.R. Donoghue, I think it reasonable to let you know what I am listening to the recordings on.
First off, I listen to the recordings digitally, as wave files. I download them to my computer and then stream the audio to an airport express which is connected via an optical digital cable to my receiver.
My receiver/amplifier is an Integra DTR-6.8. It is a 7.1 receiver, however I run it as a 5.1. The mains are Paradigm Audio Monitor 11 v.5's. The center channel is a Paradigm Audio CC290. The rears are Paradigm Audio ADP 390's. The subwoofer is a Klipsch RW-10D.
I have used Monster Cabling throughout, however, I don't have a note as to what the type of Monster Cabling is.
I hope that gives you some idea of my setup and why I choose the recordings I do. As always, your mileage may vary, and I encourage you to submit comments on my reviews, positive or negative.
First off, I listen to the recordings digitally, as wave files. I download them to my computer and then stream the audio to an airport express which is connected via an optical digital cable to my receiver.
My receiver/amplifier is an Integra DTR-6.8. It is a 7.1 receiver, however I run it as a 5.1. The mains are Paradigm Audio Monitor 11 v.5's. The center channel is a Paradigm Audio CC290. The rears are Paradigm Audio ADP 390's. The subwoofer is a Klipsch RW-10D.
I have used Monster Cabling throughout, however, I don't have a note as to what the type of Monster Cabling is.
I hope that gives you some idea of my setup and why I choose the recordings I do. As always, your mileage may vary, and I encourage you to submit comments on my reviews, positive or negative.
10-19-10 Augusta Civic Center, Augusta, ME Source Review
Yet again, Phish has played a great show in an out of the way place and there are 5 different tapers (at least) there to chronicle it. The recordings for this evening are all quite good, with a few that rose above the rest.
Source 1 (hereafter MK22 source)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter AKG 214 source)
Source: AKG c214 > Silver Cables > FR-2LE [BA TMod] (24/96)
Transfer: CF Card > Audacity (fades, tracking) > r8brain (downsampling) > TLH > Flac (level 8)
couple of feet left of DFC/DIN/about 10' high
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter AKG 393 source)
Source: AKG393's(OTS/DFC) -> Hydra Silver XLR's -> Edirol UA-5 (Oade warm mod) -> NJB3 @ 48 Khz
Transfer: NJB3 -> Firewire -> PC-> r8Brain (Resample to 44.1 Khz) -> CD WAVE Editor -> Flac Frontend
Microphone Config:Mics aimed at outside edges of PA Stacks, 10 ft high
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter ADK source)
Location: OTS just LOC
Microphone Configuration: DIN
Source: ADK SC-Ts > Busman UA-5 > Iriver 120
Transfer: Audacity > WAV > FLAC
Etree Source
I want to thank the tapers for doing all the work to make this kind of blog possible. Also, I want to thank the folks at etree for setting up a site that allows these recordings to be disseminated so quickly.
The MK22 source has low levels, and like many FOB recordings, has more crowd noise than the other sources. The kick drum is really, really boomy on this recording. Overall, there is less tonal quality on lower frequencies, which really hurts this recording.
The AKG 214 source has much lower levels than either the AKG 393 source, the Sennheuser source, or the ADK source. Gordon sounds really good at higher frequencies, but become really muddy at lower frequencies. At the beginning of A Day In The Life, Page doesn't sound nearly as good as he does on the ADK source.
The AKG 393 source has fairly low levels to begin with, but the taper corrected this early in the show. The bass is nice and full throughout the frequency range and the highs are quite crisp. This is my favorite recording of the five sources.
The Sennheuser source has great levels right from the start. The bass is very distinct, but doesn't have the punch that the ADK or AKG 393 sources have. I would say this is the 2nd or 3rd best recording, pretty much a tossup with the ADK source.
The ADK source has great levels right from the starts. The high end is very crisp and the bass has nice tone. However, at lower frequencies the bass becomes muddy and the recording is very boomy overall. As with most of the shows on this tour, Page is fairly low in the mix. Overall, this is probably the 2nd or 3rd best of the recordings as the Sennheuser source is also very good.
Happy listening!
Source 1 (hereafter MK22 source)
Source:FOB-Schoeps mk22>kc5>cmc6>psp3>mini-me@48-24>r-44>sd
Transfer:sd>vegasSRC44-16>cdwave>flac
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter AKG 214 source)
Source: AKG c214 > Silver Cables > FR-2LE [BA TMod] (24/96)
Transfer: CF Card > Audacity (fades, tracking) > r8brain (downsampling) > TLH > Flac (level 8)
couple of feet left of DFC/DIN/about 10' high
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter AKG 393 source)
Source: AKG393's(OTS/DFC) -> Hydra Silver XLR's -> Edirol UA-5 (Oade warm mod) -> NJB3 @ 48 Khz
Transfer: NJB3 -> Firewire -> PC-> r8Brain (Resample to 44.1 Khz) -> CD WAVE Editor -> Flac Frontend
Microphone Config:Mics aimed at outside edges of PA Stacks, 10 ft high
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter ADK source)
Location: OTS just LOC
Microphone Configuration: DIN
Source: ADK SC-Ts > Busman UA-5 > Iriver 120
Transfer: Audacity > WAV > FLAC
Etree Source
I want to thank the tapers for doing all the work to make this kind of blog possible. Also, I want to thank the folks at etree for setting up a site that allows these recordings to be disseminated so quickly.
The MK22 source has low levels, and like many FOB recordings, has more crowd noise than the other sources. The kick drum is really, really boomy on this recording. Overall, there is less tonal quality on lower frequencies, which really hurts this recording.
The AKG 214 source has much lower levels than either the AKG 393 source, the Sennheuser source, or the ADK source. Gordon sounds really good at higher frequencies, but become really muddy at lower frequencies. At the beginning of A Day In The Life, Page doesn't sound nearly as good as he does on the ADK source.
The AKG 393 source has fairly low levels to begin with, but the taper corrected this early in the show. The bass is nice and full throughout the frequency range and the highs are quite crisp. This is my favorite recording of the five sources.
The Sennheuser source has great levels right from the start. The bass is very distinct, but doesn't have the punch that the ADK or AKG 393 sources have. I would say this is the 2nd or 3rd best recording, pretty much a tossup with the ADK source.
The ADK source has great levels right from the starts. The high end is very crisp and the bass has nice tone. However, at lower frequencies the bass becomes muddy and the recording is very boomy overall. As with most of the shows on this tour, Page is fairly low in the mix. Overall, this is probably the 2nd or 3rd best of the recordings as the Sennheuser source is also very good.
Happy listening!
Monday, October 18, 2010
10-16-10 North Charleston Coliseum, North Charleston, NC Source Review
As with the first night of this run, there are 6 sources available. Unlike last night, there are 3 different sources from Schoeps MK41's, which makes for an interesting comparison.
Source 1 (hereafter MK41 > M248)
Source: schoeps mk41 (DINa)> CMR> Naiant PFA > Oade m248> SD 744t
Location: DFC/OTS 10'
Transfer: SD 744t HD> Samplitude> cd wave editor> TLH
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter MK4v)
Source: Source: schoeps mk 4v (DIN) > KCY> Sonosax SX- M2 LS> SD 744t (24/48)
Location: DFC/OTS 10'
Transfer: SD 744t HD> Samplitude> cd wave editor> TLH
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Neuman)
Source: Neumann ak40 > lc3 > km100 (din) > Lunatec V3 > Edirol R-44 @ 24/48
Location: OTS,DFC
Transfer: SDHC card > PC > wavelab 6.1 > cd wave > traders little helper (flac level 8)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter DPA)
Source: DPA 4023 (FOB, DFC, 6' up, DIN) > Sonosax SX-M2 > Edirol R44 (24/48)
Transfer: SDHC Card > PC > Wavelab 6 (Bass Rolloff, Fades, Resampled via resampler 192, MBIT+ Dither) > CD Wave > FLAC
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter FOB MK41)
Source: Schoeps mk41v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 6 (hereafter MK41)
Source: Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> Aeta PSP-3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, DFC, 9' Stand, NOS
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
Lots of nice recordings to choose from for this show. First of all, I want to thank the tapers for making such nice recordings. If it weren't for their efforts, I wouldn't have anything to listen to. Thanks guys.
The MK41>M248 source starts out with low levels, but they increase as Kill Devil Falls goes on. The recording is quite crispy, but in comparison, seems a bit trebbley compared to some of the other sources. There is a fair amount of crowd noise. The bass isn't as distinct as I would like. Overall, this is probably the 3rd best of the various recordings available.
The MK4v source has lower levels and a muddier bass than some of the other recordings. The recording sounds muffled compared to any of the MK41 sources, or than the Neuman source.
The Neuman AK40 source sounds fantastic. The levels are nice, and the recording is very crisp. There is some muddiness in the bass, but all of the other recordings have that problem, mostly to a greater degree. The tone of the bass is great and the highs are very crisp. In addition, this recording is available in 24 bit. In my opinion, and it is a close call, this is the recording to go with.
The DPA source has low levels and a muddy bass and well as a muddy kick drum. The whole thing is muddy in the lower frequencies, at least compared to the schoeps or neuman sources. There is also a lot of crowd noise on this source. It is also noticeably thinner sounding than the other sources.
The FOB MK41 source suffers from lower levels and muddiness as well.
The MK41 source has great bass and great levels. It is a fantastic recording. The differences between it and the Neuman source is strictly a gut call. They are both great, and both clearly superior to the other sources. The main reason I went with the Neuman source was the availability of the 24 bit recording as well as the bass response during Tweezer Reprise being slightly better.
Happy Listening!
Source 1 (hereafter MK41 > M248)
Source: schoeps mk41 (DINa)> CMR> Naiant PFA > Oade m248> SD 744t
Location: DFC/OTS 10'
Transfer: SD 744t HD> Samplitude> cd wave editor> TLH
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter MK4v)
Source: Source: schoeps mk 4v (DIN) > KCY> Sonosax SX- M2 LS> SD 744t (24/48)
Location: DFC/OTS 10'
Transfer: SD 744t HD> Samplitude> cd wave editor> TLH
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Neuman)
Source: Neumann ak40 > lc3 > km100 (din) > Lunatec V3 > Edirol R-44 @ 24/48
Location: OTS,DFC
Transfer: SDHC card > PC > wavelab 6.1 > cd wave > traders little helper (flac level 8)
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter DPA)
Source: DPA 4023 (FOB, DFC, 6' up, DIN) > Sonosax SX-M2 > Edirol R44 (24/48)
Transfer: SDHC Card > PC > Wavelab 6 (Bass Rolloff, Fades, Resampled via resampler 192, MBIT+ Dither) > CD Wave > FLAC
Etree Source
24 bit Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter FOB MK41)
Source: Schoeps mk41v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 6 (hereafter MK41)
Source: Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> Aeta PSP-3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, DFC, 9' Stand, NOS
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
Photo by Lacy Lynn |
Lots of nice recordings to choose from for this show. First of all, I want to thank the tapers for making such nice recordings. If it weren't for their efforts, I wouldn't have anything to listen to. Thanks guys.
The MK41>M248 source starts out with low levels, but they increase as Kill Devil Falls goes on. The recording is quite crispy, but in comparison, seems a bit trebbley compared to some of the other sources. There is a fair amount of crowd noise. The bass isn't as distinct as I would like. Overall, this is probably the 3rd best of the various recordings available.
The MK4v source has lower levels and a muddier bass than some of the other recordings. The recording sounds muffled compared to any of the MK41 sources, or than the Neuman source.
The Neuman AK40 source sounds fantastic. The levels are nice, and the recording is very crisp. There is some muddiness in the bass, but all of the other recordings have that problem, mostly to a greater degree. The tone of the bass is great and the highs are very crisp. In addition, this recording is available in 24 bit. In my opinion, and it is a close call, this is the recording to go with.
The DPA source has low levels and a muddy bass and well as a muddy kick drum. The whole thing is muddy in the lower frequencies, at least compared to the schoeps or neuman sources. There is also a lot of crowd noise on this source. It is also noticeably thinner sounding than the other sources.
The FOB MK41 source suffers from lower levels and muddiness as well.
The MK41 source has great bass and great levels. It is a fantastic recording. The differences between it and the Neuman source is strictly a gut call. They are both great, and both clearly superior to the other sources. The main reason I went with the Neuman source was the availability of the 24 bit recording as well as the bass response during Tweezer Reprise being slightly better.
Happy Listening!
Sunday, October 17, 2010
10-15-10 North Charleston Coliseum, Charletston, SC Source Review
Lots of sources to choose from here. In addition to the 6 I am reviewing here, there are at least 2 24 bit sources of these that are also available, at least as of 10-16 in the evening.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman source)
Source: Neumann ak40's(dina)>lc3>km100>V3>722>@24/48
Location: FOB>DFC>50' from stage @ 6'
Transfer: 722>cd wave>wavelab(fades/resample)>trader's little helper>flac
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter MK41 source)
Source: Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> Aeta PSP-3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, DFC, 9' Stand, NOS
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter MK4V source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023 (FOB, DFC, 6' up, DIN) > Sonosax SX-M2 > Edirol R44 (24/48)
Transfer: SDHC Card > PC > Wavelab 6 (Bass Rolloff, Fades, Resampled via resampler 192, MBIT+ Dither) > CD Wave > FLAC
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter AKG source)
Source: AKG 483 (OTS, DIN @ 10ft) > Oade m248 > Oade mod-SBM-1 > JB3 @ 44.1kHz
Transfer: JB3 > WaveLab > CD Wave > flac (6)
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter MK41+MK21 matrix, or just matrix source)
Source: schoeps mk41 (DINa)> KCY> Sonosax SX-M2 LS + mk21> KCY> vms5u> SD 744t (24/48) (suzzie till end mk41's only)
Location: DFC/OTS 10'
Transfer: SD 744t HD> Samplitude> cd wave editor> TLH
Etree Source
First of all, big thanks to all the tapers for making great recordings again. If it weren't for the efforts of these tapers, and the amazing turn around times, it would be months or longer before we would get to hear these shows. As it is, we only have to wait 1 day or so for multiple sources to show up.
The matrix source looks great on paper, but it has noticeably low levels and sounds pretty thin right from the start. The highs are quite crisp, but there isn't really good bass response. Further, at low frequencies, the bass becomes nothing but a thud with little to no tonal quality. There is a lot of crowd noise. The main thing noticeable about this recording is that it is really bright sounding.
The AKG source is probable the second best of the bunch. The levels are really nice, but the bass has a little bit poorer response than the MK41 source and overall, the recording is a bit tinny.
The DPA source has lower levels and really rumbly sounding bass, however the bass does have a nice tone where it is clear. Like the matrix, there is a lot of crowd noise.
The MK4v source has a whole lot of crowd noise. At times, it sounds like its underwater compared to the other sources. The bass is very thuddy with very little tone at the lowest frequencies.
The Neuman source has low levels, particularly compared to the MK41 or AKG, again the bass is a bit thuddy, but it is noticeably better than the DPA, MK4V, or matrix source as far as tone is concerned, particularly down low. Overall, a nice recording.
The MK41 source sounds the best to my ears. The bass is very nice and distinct to the lowest frequencies. There is nice separation amongst the instruments and the highs are very crisp. There is a 24 bit version of this available and if you have the capabilities, this is what I would recommend.
Happy listening!
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman source)
Source: Neumann ak40's(dina)>lc3>km100>V3>722>@24/48
Location: FOB>DFC>50' from stage @ 6'
Transfer: 722>cd wave>wavelab(fades/resample)>trader's little helper>flac
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter MK41 source)
Source: Schoeps mk41> KC5> M222> NT222> Aeta PSP-3> SD 744t (@24bit/96kHz)
Location: OTS, DFC, 9' Stand, NOS
Transfer: SD 744t> Samplitude SE 9.1.1(dither/resample)> CDWave> flac(16/44.1)
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter MK4V source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 4 (hereafter DPA source)
Source: DPA 4023 (FOB, DFC, 6' up, DIN) > Sonosax SX-M2 > Edirol R44 (24/48)
Transfer: SDHC Card > PC > Wavelab 6 (Bass Rolloff, Fades, Resampled via resampler 192, MBIT+ Dither) > CD Wave > FLAC
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter AKG source)
Source: AKG 483 (OTS, DIN @ 10ft) > Oade m248 > Oade mod-SBM-1 > JB3 @ 44.1kHz
Transfer: JB3 > WaveLab > CD Wave > flac (6)
Etree Source
Source 5 (hereafter MK41+MK21 matrix, or just matrix source)
Source: schoeps mk41 (DINa)> KCY> Sonosax SX-M2 LS + mk21> KCY> vms5u> SD 744t (24/48) (suzzie till end mk41's only)
Location: DFC/OTS 10'
Transfer: SD 744t HD> Samplitude> cd wave editor> TLH
Etree Source
First of all, big thanks to all the tapers for making great recordings again. If it weren't for the efforts of these tapers, and the amazing turn around times, it would be months or longer before we would get to hear these shows. As it is, we only have to wait 1 day or so for multiple sources to show up.
The matrix source looks great on paper, but it has noticeably low levels and sounds pretty thin right from the start. The highs are quite crisp, but there isn't really good bass response. Further, at low frequencies, the bass becomes nothing but a thud with little to no tonal quality. There is a lot of crowd noise. The main thing noticeable about this recording is that it is really bright sounding.
The AKG source is probable the second best of the bunch. The levels are really nice, but the bass has a little bit poorer response than the MK41 source and overall, the recording is a bit tinny.
The DPA source has lower levels and really rumbly sounding bass, however the bass does have a nice tone where it is clear. Like the matrix, there is a lot of crowd noise.
The MK4v source has a whole lot of crowd noise. At times, it sounds like its underwater compared to the other sources. The bass is very thuddy with very little tone at the lowest frequencies.
The Neuman source has low levels, particularly compared to the MK41 or AKG, again the bass is a bit thuddy, but it is noticeably better than the DPA, MK4V, or matrix source as far as tone is concerned, particularly down low. Overall, a nice recording.
The MK41 source sounds the best to my ears. The bass is very nice and distinct to the lowest frequencies. There is nice separation amongst the instruments and the highs are very crisp. There is a 24 bit version of this available and if you have the capabilities, this is what I would recommend.
Happy listening!
Friday, October 15, 2010
10-12-10 1st Bank Center, Broomfield, CO Source Review Update
Alrighty! There is a new source available for this show, the Sennheuser source that has been available for the other two Phish shows at Broomfield, which I have compared to the Neuman source previously available.
Here is my first source review for this night.
Source 2 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed at PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
As with the other three nights, the Sennheuser source is quite good. Compared to the Neuman source, there is much less crowd noise. The highs are great, nice and crisp. However, the overall effect is a bit thinner than the Neuman source. As well, there is muddiness in the very lows which is absent on the Neuman source. Notice at the beginning of the David Bowie, Mike hits some very low notes prior to the "1st verse!", these are no longer noticeable as notes on the Sennheuser source, while they are still distinct on the Neuman source. Both sources continue to suffer from Page being low in the mix. We can only hope that this is fixed tonight.
Again, I have to tip the hat at all of these tapers who have made excellent tapes. If you don't like bass hitting you in the gut the way I do, you might prefer the Sennheuser source. I am still going with the Neuman source unless something better comes along.
Happy Listening!
Here is my first source review for this night.
Source 2 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed at PA array, centered, 12.5 feet high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Photo By A. Gordy |
As with the other three nights, the Sennheuser source is quite good. Compared to the Neuman source, there is much less crowd noise. The highs are great, nice and crisp. However, the overall effect is a bit thinner than the Neuman source. As well, there is muddiness in the very lows which is absent on the Neuman source. Notice at the beginning of the David Bowie, Mike hits some very low notes prior to the "1st verse!", these are no longer noticeable as notes on the Sennheuser source, while they are still distinct on the Neuman source. Both sources continue to suffer from Page being low in the mix. We can only hope that this is fixed tonight.
Again, I have to tip the hat at all of these tapers who have made excellent tapes. If you don't like bass hitting you in the gut the way I do, you might prefer the Sennheuser source. I am still going with the Neuman source unless something better comes along.
Happy Listening!
Thursday, October 14, 2010
10-12-10 1st Bank Center, Broomfield, CO Source Review
Well, I've tried to give it some time, but as of this writing (October 14 pm) there is still only 1 source available. Luckily for us, it sounds great.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 20db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > *Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC
Etree Source
This source is identical to the Neuman source from the other two nights at Broomfield, as well as the Mike & Trey acoustic set from the 4 Mile Canyon Benefit. As with the other nights, these tapes have excellent presence. The highs are very crisp and the low-end is quite well defined. As with the other two nights, Page seems low in the mix to my ears, particularly on the piano. As with the other nights, there is noticeable crowd noise, which is not surprising coming from an FOB recording. It is not distracting, and actually adds to the illusion of actually being there.
I heartily recommend this recording, though I will be on the lookout for others, if just to have a point of comparison. As new sources become available for this, or any other show, I will add those to the show review, and point out any that are clear upgrades for those of you out there that are looking for the best (and isn't that why you're reading this anyway?).
Once again, I must thank gotfob for his work at taping all 4 of these shows. He does an excellent job and is to be commended.
Happy listening.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 20db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > *Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC
Etree Source
This source is identical to the Neuman source from the other two nights at Broomfield, as well as the Mike & Trey acoustic set from the 4 Mile Canyon Benefit. As with the other nights, these tapes have excellent presence. The highs are very crisp and the low-end is quite well defined. As with the other two nights, Page seems low in the mix to my ears, particularly on the piano. As with the other nights, there is noticeable crowd noise, which is not surprising coming from an FOB recording. It is not distracting, and actually adds to the illusion of actually being there.
I heartily recommend this recording, though I will be on the lookout for others, if just to have a point of comparison. As new sources become available for this, or any other show, I will add those to the show review, and point out any that are clear upgrades for those of you out there that are looking for the best (and isn't that why you're reading this anyway?).
Once again, I must thank gotfob for his work at taping all 4 of these shows. He does an excellent job and is to be commended.
Happy listening.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
10-11-10 1st Bank Center, Broomfield, CO Source Review
As of this afternoon (October 13) there are again 3 sources available.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 20db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12 feet 4 inches high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
These three sources are identical to those available from the night before, however, for whatever reason, my ears tell me that they have changed slightly. Perhaps the mix was different in the house, causing these differences. Nevertheless, the same basic problem from the first night is still evident, namely, Page is too low in the mix, particularly the piano.
The Schoeps source comes in a bit bass heavy at the start of Runaway Jim, but this seems to back off, and the sound of the bass is quite crisp, even at the low notes. To really hear the low notes, check out when Gordon and Fish hit together at the beginning of Tweezer Reprise. My house shook, just the way I like it. About 30 seconds later, Mike does a kind of sweeping thing with the bass, and this is where the Schoeps source outshines the others, it is clear, and distinct. On the Sennheuser source, this is muddy.
The Neuman source has a more balanced bass response from the beginning. The highs, as usual shimmer nicely, and you can hear the air being pushed from the house speakers. Actually, what I think you are hearing is Fish's snare drum rattling from the noise being produced on stage. This is particularly noticeable during quieter parts. There is noticeable chatting during quieter parts as well, but this is to be expected from an FOB recording.
As stated above, the bass is a bit muddy on the Sennheuser source as well as the mids. I am not sure what changed here as the source info is identical to the night before.
I want to thank the tapers for making some excellent tapes again. All three are very good, with the Neuman and Schoeps source being a bit better than the Sennheuser. If forced to choose, I think the Schoeps source is the one to go with for this night. Its what will be on my hard drive going forward.
Happy Listening.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 20db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12 feet 4 inches high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
These three sources are identical to those available from the night before, however, for whatever reason, my ears tell me that they have changed slightly. Perhaps the mix was different in the house, causing these differences. Nevertheless, the same basic problem from the first night is still evident, namely, Page is too low in the mix, particularly the piano.
The Schoeps source comes in a bit bass heavy at the start of Runaway Jim, but this seems to back off, and the sound of the bass is quite crisp, even at the low notes. To really hear the low notes, check out when Gordon and Fish hit together at the beginning of Tweezer Reprise. My house shook, just the way I like it. About 30 seconds later, Mike does a kind of sweeping thing with the bass, and this is where the Schoeps source outshines the others, it is clear, and distinct. On the Sennheuser source, this is muddy.
The Neuman source has a more balanced bass response from the beginning. The highs, as usual shimmer nicely, and you can hear the air being pushed from the house speakers. Actually, what I think you are hearing is Fish's snare drum rattling from the noise being produced on stage. This is particularly noticeable during quieter parts. There is noticeable chatting during quieter parts as well, but this is to be expected from an FOB recording.
As stated above, the bass is a bit muddy on the Sennheuser source as well as the mids. I am not sure what changed here as the source info is identical to the night before.
I want to thank the tapers for making some excellent tapes again. All three are very good, with the Neuman and Schoeps source being a bit better than the Sennheuser. If forced to choose, I think the Schoeps source is the one to go with for this night. Its what will be on my hard drive going forward.
Happy Listening.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
10-10-10 1st Bank Center, Broomfield, CO Tape Review
As of this morning (October 12) there are 3 sources available. All three are excellent and you can't really go wrong with any one of them. However, it is my job to review and critique them, so here goes.
Source 1 (hearafter Schoeps source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 2 (hearafter Neuman source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 20db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > *Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC (*Lowered Gain By -1db.)
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12 feet 4 inches high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Much like the Trey and Mike benefit show from the night before, all of the recordings available are excellent, and where they are deficient, they are all that way, which I attribute to the house mix. First the deficiency, Page is very low in the mix and I think this is to the detriment of the show overall.
Now the good stuff, the Neuman source, as with the night before, has a long intro of crowd noise before the first track, while the other two sources split the crowd intro into a separate track. There is a strong bass response from the Neuman source, but it does have a slight lack of definition between the bass and kick drum at the low end. However, this problem is more pronounced in the Sennheuser and Schoeps sources. When you hear Gordon hit an extremely low note all alone, as in the intro to Ocelot, it is clear and well-defined.
The Sennheuser source has especially crisp highs and, like the Neuman source, good frequency response into the lower registers. There is a bit more mid-range in Trey's tone which makes this source slightly less preferred than the Neuman.
Unlike the night before, the Schoeps source performed the least well. The levels are noticeably low at the beginning of Chalkdust Torture, though the taper quickly remedies this as the full band comes in. However, there is not as much punch as I like when Gordon really gets the song going. There is great definition in the highs. Also, there is noticeable chatting during some of the quieter parts of songs.
Once again, I must tip my hat to these tapers who put forth so much effort in both recording the performances as well as disseminating them so rapidly. All three sources were available before 12 noon eastern the day after the show. That's incredible. As I said from the outset, all three recordings are excellent. However, if forced to choose, I would rate the Neuman source the best, the Sennheuser source next, and the Schoeps source last.
Happy listening!
Source 1 (hearafter Schoeps source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
Source 2 (hearafter Neuman source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 20db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > *Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC (*Lowered Gain By -1db.)
Etree Source
Source 3 (hereafter Sennheuser source)
Field: Sennheiser MD441U > Edirol R4Pro ( Oade preamp mod ) @ 24/88.2
config: pointed slightly outside PA array, centered, 12 feet 4 inches high.
Path: R4Pro > WaveBurner ( track on sector boundaries, fades, SRC, BDC ) > xACT ( to flac, and for tagging and checksums )
Etree Source
Much like the Trey and Mike benefit show from the night before, all of the recordings available are excellent, and where they are deficient, they are all that way, which I attribute to the house mix. First the deficiency, Page is very low in the mix and I think this is to the detriment of the show overall.
Now the good stuff, the Neuman source, as with the night before, has a long intro of crowd noise before the first track, while the other two sources split the crowd intro into a separate track. There is a strong bass response from the Neuman source, but it does have a slight lack of definition between the bass and kick drum at the low end. However, this problem is more pronounced in the Sennheuser and Schoeps sources. When you hear Gordon hit an extremely low note all alone, as in the intro to Ocelot, it is clear and well-defined.
The Sennheuser source has especially crisp highs and, like the Neuman source, good frequency response into the lower registers. There is a bit more mid-range in Trey's tone which makes this source slightly less preferred than the Neuman.
Unlike the night before, the Schoeps source performed the least well. The levels are noticeably low at the beginning of Chalkdust Torture, though the taper quickly remedies this as the full band comes in. However, there is not as much punch as I like when Gordon really gets the song going. There is great definition in the highs. Also, there is noticeable chatting during some of the quieter parts of songs.
Once again, I must tip my hat to these tapers who put forth so much effort in both recording the performances as well as disseminating them so rapidly. All three sources were available before 12 noon eastern the day after the show. That's incredible. As I said from the outset, all three recordings are excellent. However, if forced to choose, I would rate the Neuman source the best, the Sennheuser source next, and the Schoeps source last.
Happy listening!
Monday, October 11, 2010
10-09-10 Four Mile Canyon Benefit Trey & Mike
At this point (Monday, October 11th am) there are two different recordings available.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman Source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 23db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > *Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC (*Lowered Gain By -1db.)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps Source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
The Schoeps source is only available as a download of the entire concert, while the Neuman source is available as strictly a Trey & Mike download. The Leftover Salmon and String Cheese sets (with sit-ins by Page and Trey) are available separately.
First of all, thanks to the tapers for doing the work and making these recordings available so quickly after the show. Both of these recordings are top notch with very subtle differences between them. The Neuman source has slightly lower levels overall than the Schoeps source. There is good separation between the guitar and bass on both recordings, with the Schoeps source having a bit more shimmer in the highs (which I like on the acoustic guitar) but this could be because the levels are hotter and thus is more noticeable at constant volume. There is crowd noise evident on both of these recordings, which are both front of board. There is a long lead-in to the first track on the Neuman source which is cut into a separate track on the Schoeps source. The bass is a little bit better defined on the Schoeps source, but only marginally so. It appears that the Schoeps have better bass response at extreme low frequencies, resulting in an overall better bass sound. However, these differences are extremely minute.
Thus, I must give the nod to the Schoeps source, but both tapers are to be commended, they both sound excellent and you can't go wrong with either recording.
As an addendum, I compared the recordings of Leftover Salmon from both sources. There are similar problems with each that I attribute to the house mix rather than the mics, particularly since they both suffer virtually identically. The low end and mids are a muddy mess. There is very little distinction between the kick drum and bass, and very little distinction between the guitar and mandolin while both are playing rhythm. If the banjo didn't have such a distinct attack, I am sure it would be lost in the middle too. The vocals are clear and distinct. Overall, its a tape worth having if you are a fan of the band, but otherwise, I think the mix just isn't that good.
Source 1 (hereafter Neuman Source)
Source: FOB/DFC > Neumann ak40's(NOS) > lc3 >
km100 > Aerco mp2 @ 23db > Sd 702 @ 24/48
Transfer: Cf Card > *Wavelab 6.0 > Resample/Uv 22Hr Dither >
Cd Wave > TLH > 16/44 FLAC (*Lowered Gain By -1db.)
Etree Source
Source 2 (hereafter Schoeps Source)
Source: Schoeps mk4v's(DINa)>kc5>m222>nt222>744t
Location: FOB/DFC
Transfer: 744t>CD Wave>Wavelab 5>Flac
Etree Source
The Schoeps source is only available as a download of the entire concert, while the Neuman source is available as strictly a Trey & Mike download. The Leftover Salmon and String Cheese sets (with sit-ins by Page and Trey) are available separately.
First of all, thanks to the tapers for doing the work and making these recordings available so quickly after the show. Both of these recordings are top notch with very subtle differences between them. The Neuman source has slightly lower levels overall than the Schoeps source. There is good separation between the guitar and bass on both recordings, with the Schoeps source having a bit more shimmer in the highs (which I like on the acoustic guitar) but this could be because the levels are hotter and thus is more noticeable at constant volume. There is crowd noise evident on both of these recordings, which are both front of board. There is a long lead-in to the first track on the Neuman source which is cut into a separate track on the Schoeps source. The bass is a little bit better defined on the Schoeps source, but only marginally so. It appears that the Schoeps have better bass response at extreme low frequencies, resulting in an overall better bass sound. However, these differences are extremely minute.
Thus, I must give the nod to the Schoeps source, but both tapers are to be commended, they both sound excellent and you can't go wrong with either recording.
As an addendum, I compared the recordings of Leftover Salmon from both sources. There are similar problems with each that I attribute to the house mix rather than the mics, particularly since they both suffer virtually identically. The low end and mids are a muddy mess. There is very little distinction between the kick drum and bass, and very little distinction between the guitar and mandolin while both are playing rhythm. If the banjo didn't have such a distinct attack, I am sure it would be lost in the middle too. The vocals are clear and distinct. Overall, its a tape worth having if you are a fan of the band, but otherwise, I think the mix just isn't that good.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Friday, October 8, 2010 - Austin City Limits Tapes Reviewed
Well, at this point (Sunday afternoon) there is only 1 source available (other than the sbd source from phish.com). The source is as follows:
Source: Mod Nak 701’s -> Luminous Audio P/S -> Korg MR-1 (1bit/2.8MHz DSD)
Location: fob, 6’ right of dfc, 60’ from stage
Transfer: Korg MR-1 -> AudioGate (16/44) -> CD Wave -> FLAC
Etree source
My frequency analyzer says that this tape is fairly bass heavy, but my ears tell me differently. One thing the frequency analyzer is right about, however, is that the levels are low on this recording. The levels peak at -10db, which leaves plenty of room for the taper to boost it, certainly after the fact. There is definitely something missing at the low end. When Mike lays a bomb, there is no blow to the gut, which is kind of the way I like it. Mike actually sounds kind of buried, particularly in the low end, where the attack and sonic quality of the note seem to be lost. However, at this point, this is all that's out there. The drums are well defined with no whirring in the high-hats. Trey is not as out in front as he usually is. This is a very listenable tape however. There is some muddiness in the middle of the spectrum and there isn't great separation between the instruments. However, this could well be the result of the "festival mix" which is notoriously not as good as what Phish brings to the table on their own. I will continue to look for other options as the week goes on.
Source: Mod Nak 701’s -> Luminous Audio P/S -> Korg MR-1 (1bit/2.8MHz DSD)
Location: fob, 6’ right of dfc, 60’ from stage
Transfer: Korg MR-1 -> AudioGate (16/44) -> CD Wave -> FLAC
Etree source
My frequency analyzer says that this tape is fairly bass heavy, but my ears tell me differently. One thing the frequency analyzer is right about, however, is that the levels are low on this recording. The levels peak at -10db, which leaves plenty of room for the taper to boost it, certainly after the fact. There is definitely something missing at the low end. When Mike lays a bomb, there is no blow to the gut, which is kind of the way I like it. Mike actually sounds kind of buried, particularly in the low end, where the attack and sonic quality of the note seem to be lost. However, at this point, this is all that's out there. The drums are well defined with no whirring in the high-hats. Trey is not as out in front as he usually is. This is a very listenable tape however. There is some muddiness in the middle of the spectrum and there isn't great separation between the instruments. However, this could well be the result of the "festival mix" which is notoriously not as good as what Phish brings to the table on their own. I will continue to look for other options as the week goes on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)